AWS Security Hub · ECS
ECS.21: Windows containers should run as non-admin users
Written and reviewed by Emnode · Last reviewed
What does AWS Security Hub ECS.21 check?
ECS.21 evaluates task definitions whose operatingSystemFamily is WINDOWS_SERVER (or unset) and fails when any container omits the user field or sets it to the default containeradministrator account — the built-in Windows identity with full admin rights inside the container.
Why does ECS.21 matter?
A container running as containeradministrator that gets compromised — through an app vulnerability, a poisoned dependency, or an exposed endpoint — hands the attacker full administrative rights inside it. Container-escape techniques then become materially easier and more damaging, because the attacker already holds the highest privilege the container offers rather than having to escalate to it.
How do I fix ECS.21?
- Create or use a lower-privilege Windows account in the image and set the container definition's user field to it.
- Confirm the application's files, registry keys, and ports are accessible to that account.
- Register the new revision and redeploy the Windows service.
Remediation script · bash
# Inventory: flag containers running as root or with a writable root filesystem.
for fam in $(aws ecs list-task-definition-families --status ACTIVE \
--query 'families[]' --output text); do
aws ecs describe-task-definition --task-definition "$fam" \
--query "taskDefinition.containerDefinitions[?user==null || user=='root' || user=='0' || readonlyRootFilesystem!=\`true\`].{Family:'$fam',Name:name,User:user,ReadOnly:readonlyRootFilesystem}" \
--output text
done
# Harden at the source. Dockerfile:
# RUN addgroup -S app && adduser -S -G app appuser
# USER appuser
# Task definition: non-root user, read-only root with one narrow tmpfs, secrets via ARN.
# "user": "1000:1000",
# "readonlyRootFilesystem": true,
# "mountPoints": [{ "sourceVolume": "scratch", "containerPath": "/tmp", "readOnly": false }],
# "secrets": [{ "name": "DB_PASSWORD",
# "valueFrom": "arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:123456789012:secret:prod/checkout/db-AbCdEf" }]
# Register the hardened revision and roll it out (tasks only update on redeploy).
aws ecs register-task-definition --cli-input-json file://checkout-api-hardened.json
aws ecs update-service --cluster prod --service checkout-api \
--task-definition checkout-api --force-new-deployment Full walkthrough (console steps, edge cases and verification) in the lesson Harden ECS container workloads.
Is ECS.21 a false positive?
ECS.21 is Windows-specific; the Linux root case is the separate ECS.20 control. A backlog of these accumulates quietly because nothing forces teams to set user on Windows tasks — most never do.
More ECS controls
- ECS.2 An ECS service auto-assigns public IPs to tasks
- ECS.3 A task definition shares the host PID namespace
- ECS.4 A container runs in privileged mode
- ECS.5 A container has a writable root filesystem
- ECS.8 Secrets are passed as plaintext container env vars
- ECS.9 A task definition has no logging configuration
- ECS.10 Fargate services should run latest platform version
- ECS.12 ECS clusters should use Container Insights
- ECS.16 An ECS task set auto-assigns public IPs
- ECS.18 ECS task defs should encrypt EFS volumes in transit
- ECS.19 Capacity providers managed termination protection
- ECS.20 Linux containers should run as non-root users